There
are many articles on the Internet that either support or object to the protests
held on Presidents Day. An interesting observation about the two articles that
I have found in my search is how they persuade their intended audience. Both
articles opened my eyes to differing viewpoints about the “Not My President
Day” rallies and if the rallies were a success or just complete failures.
The
first article in my search discussed how the “Not My President Day” rallies
dishonored Presidents Day. This article persuades the reader that Presidents
Day is an honorable day. The article
states that during the Great Depression Presidents Day reassured the nation all
would be okay. The reader is lead to believe that Presidents Day honors the
leaders that inspire us through good and bad times. The next persuasive effort
that is used in this article is the transition to the second paragraph. The
author reflects on the important past of Presidents Day and transports the
reader to present day showing how times differ. The reader is convinced that Presidents
Day is now disgraced. Another persuasive tactic wants to separate the anti-Trump
population for the rest of the American population. The author claims that
these protesters are just a group demonstrating their dislike for Trump. This
article would offend non-Trump supporters but encourage Trump supporters
showing that this article is right leaning. The article then expands on all
protests that have occurred during and after the Trump election in a belittling
way. This is persuasive to a reader because the author is not just saying these
specific protests are unsuccessful but also the whole anti-Trump movement in
general is a failure.
The next article that I discovered
was a right leaning piece that supported the “Not My Presidents Day” protests
with an interesting use of language. This article described the protests as an
“artistic resistance to the Trump administration”. A reader can relate to this catching
statement, therefore making it persuasive. This article does not only target
anti-Trump supporters; it targets anti-Trump supporters who are artists,
musicians, and musicians. This is an interesting persuasive technique because
the author is not just targeting the general group but a specific group within
the ant-Trump population. The article persuades other artists to join the
movement by explaining how the protests help people express their feelings
through art. Finally another persuasive technique found in the article and many
other right leaning articles is to encourage various groups to join in the
Presidents Day rallies by communicating the various rallies locations. If a
person reading this piece feels inspired they are one click away from joining
the anti-Trump movement.
Both of these articles differ in their
viewpoint about the protests that were held on Presidents Day and use
interesting techniques to persuade. The main point of the first article was not
only were Americans disgracing their current president in addition to the
President Day holiday in general. In the second article the author persuades
the reader by targeting a specific group in the general anti-Trump population. Both
of these articles did an exceptional job in persuading their target audiences.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/not-my-president-rallies-dishonor-presidents-day/article/2615320
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/02/16/not-my-presidents-day-artists-and-performers-resist-trump-feb-20-events
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/not-my-president-rallies-dishonor-presidents-day/article/2615320
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/02/16/not-my-presidents-day-artists-and-performers-resist-trump-feb-20-events
Good work here! You are on it!
ReplyDeleteBe careful of making assumptions regarding how readers would respond to this (or any) article. Your goal here is to discuss the strategies and tactics being used in the article rather than to discuss whether or not it is any reader's best interest to believe or disbelieve what is being asserted.
I appreciate that broadening your own reading has served to "open your eyes" to the way political discourse works in our society. That's a great consequence! Please let me know how I can help!